Dataphor Product Anatomy

1. Summary

This chapter introduces the Dataphor product, and discusses how it enables automated application development.

2. Overview

The Dataphor product is an application development platform based on the declarative approach using the relational model. It consists of the following major components:

Dataphor Server

The core of the Dataphor product that exposes all the services and capabilities required to enable automated application development.

Frontend Server

A set of services exposed as a library in the Dataphor Server that the Frontend Clients can utilize to enable automated application development.

Frontend Clients

A set of "thin" clients designed to consume Dataphor applications.


An Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for building, administering and maintaining Dataphor applications.

3. Dataphor Server

The Dataphor Server is designed to enable automated application development. In order to achieve this goal, the Dataphor Server plays two major roles. Firstly, it acts as an insulating layer between the application and the data storage systems it uses. Secondly, it acts as an environment for declarative application development by providing the services and capabilities discussed in the previous chapters. In both of these roles, the Dataphor Server is used by the application in much the same way that a traditional DBMS is used.

The Dataphor Server functions as a DBMS in that it must coordinate requests from multiple users to access the same data. Ensuring that each user request is fulfilled efficiently and correctly is a highly non-trivial task. In order to accomplish the process, the functionality of the Dataphor Server is divided into subsystems:

Each subsystem is responsible for a specific set of tasks in the overall system. The Manager coordinates the interaction between the different subsystems. The Catalog is the repository for the data structures which the Dataphor Server can access. The Compiler is responsible for translating user requests into efficient executable plans, which the Query Processor is then responsible for executing. The Storage Integrator provides the abstraction layer through which all data in the Dataphor Server is accessed.

Collectively, these subsystems reside in a .NET Framework application domain hosted within an operating system process. This is known as a Dataphor Server instance and represents a single Dataphor Server providing data management services for a single database. Note that, like a traditional DBMS, the Dataphor Server can host multiple applications within a single instance.

A Dataphor Server instance can be hosted within any .NET Framework application, or within a Windows Service. For more information on configuring the Dataphor Server as a Windows Service, see the Dataphor User’s Guide.

3.1. Manager

The Manager controls the interaction between all the subsystems of the Dataphor Server. It manages running processes, routes user requests, and coordinates the actions of the different storage systems with which the Dataphor Server communicates. The tasks of the manager are divided into layers as follows:

The manager exposes the functionality of the Dataphor Server at these different layers through the Call-Level Interface (CLI), an Application Programming Interface (API) designed specifically for use with the Dataphor Server. The CLI is a set of .NET Framework interfaces which allow programmatic access to the functionality of the Dataphor Server. Each layer of the manager architecture has a corresponding level in the CLI which exposes the functionality associated at that level.

All the functionality and capabilities of the Dataphor Server are exposed through a data access language called D4. This language provides the interface to the logical model of the system, and is the main application development language for Dataphor applications. It is an imperative language in the syntactic style of Pascal, extended to include all the functionality of a database management language. In particular, it is a relationally complete language based on the relational algebra. For a complete discussion of the D4 language, see the D4 Language Guide in this manual.

The CLI is the lowest level of access to the Dataphor Server. On top of the CLI, higher-level access mechanisms are available such as the Dataphor Data Access Components (DAC). For complete references for the CLI and the DAC, refer to the Dataphor Reference.

Briefly, the server level controls all the global tasks such as system configuration and startup. The session manages the tasks associated with each user such as user configuration and starting and stopping processes. The process is the basic level of execution in the Dataphor Server, and coordinates the actions of the compiler and query processor to fulfill requests from the user. The plan manages tasks associated with prepared statements such as structural and metadata description and cursor requests. And finally, the cursor level manages tasks associated with the retrieval of results. Each of these levels are discussed in detail in the CLI discussion in the Presentation Layer part of this manual.

3.2. Catalog

The catalog of the Dataphor Server is the central repository for the application schema, or the description of the structure of the database. The catalog also contains such items as compiled operators, storage device descriptions, and security information. All this information is used by the various subsystems to provide the functionality exposed by the Dataphor Server. For example, the manager uses the catalog to ensure that a given connection request is made by a valid user of the system; the compiler uses the catalog to ensure that a given statement references valid objects in the database; and so on.

The catalog is exposed through D4 as a set of tables containing rows which describe the current contents of the catalog. For example, there is a table variable called System.Operators which has a row for every operator in the system. For a complete description of the system catalog, refer to the System Library Reference in the Dataphor Reference.

Catalog objects can be created, altered, and dropped through the use of Data Definition Language (DDL) statements of the D4 language. For a complete description of each of these statements, refer to the D4 Language Guide in this manual.

Each object in the catalog can have metadata associated with it, which is additional information that is ignored by the logical model. Metadata is used by specific applications to provide extra information about each object. For example, the Frontend uses a tag called Frontend.Title to determine the presentation layer description for a corresponding user interface element.

The entire catalog is divided into units called libraries. Every catalog object is contained within some library. Libraries provide the fundamental deployment unit for Dataphor applications. They also form a unit of dependency tracking, in that the objects contained within a library cannot reference objects in other libraries unless the library they are in depends on the library containing the object being referenced.

The Dataphor Server catalog contains the following types of objects:

  • Libraries

  • Scalar Types

  • Tables

  • Views

  • Constraints

  • References

  • Operators

  • Devices

  • Users

  • Roles

  • Rights

  • Event Handlers

  • Conversions

  • Sorts

For more information on each of these types of objects, see the Catalog Elements section of the D4 Language Guide in this manual.

For more information on using these elements to construct a Dataphor Application, refer to the Logical Application Design] part of this manual.

For more information on the security system of the Dataphor Server, refer to the Security chapter of the Dataphor User’s Guide.

3.3. Compiler

The compiler subsystem is responsible for ensuring the syntactic and semantic correctness of a given user request, and for producing an executable plan to fulfill that request. User requests are made in terms of D4, the native language of the Dataphor Server

The compilation process is divided up into the following phases:

  • Lexical Analysis

  • Syntactic Analysis

  • Semantic Analysis

  • Optimization

  • Binding

The output from one phase functions as the input to the next phase of the process. The input to the lexical analysis phase is the user request as a string of characters, and the output from the binding phase is a compiled plan ready for execution in the query processor.

The lexical analysis phase is concerned with transforming a given string of characters into a sequence of tokens. This phase is also responsible for removing comments and whitespace from the input stream.

The syntactic analysis phase is concerned with ensuring that a given stream of tokens forms a correct statement of the language. This process is handled by the parser. The output of this phase is a syntactically correct representation of the user request.

The semantic analysis phase is concerned with ensuring that a given user request is meaningful. This phase involves resolving identifiers and operator invocations, and performing type checking. During this phase, the compiler makes use of the catalog to perform identifier and operator resolution. The output of this phase is a direct translation of the user request into instructions for use in the query processor. This is a preliminary version of the plan that has not been bound to actual storage locations yet, but it is guaranteed to be semantically correct. Once the compiler reaches this phase, the user request is known to be a correct program of D4.

The optimization phase is concerned with high-level transformations to the user request in an attempt to produce a more efficient execution plan. For example, if a user request contains a restrict followed immediately by a restrict, the two restricts can be combined into one without changing the semantics of the statement, and yielding better performance.

The binding phase is concerned with access-path determination, and device selection. Device selection is done through a process called query chunking, in which the processor instructions are considered from the retrieval steps up. At each step of the query, the devices involved are asked to prepare an equivalent execution. If a device is capable of performing a particular step of the query, it is assigned to do so. Otherwise, the Dataphor Server must process the query. Access-path determination is concerned with finding an efficient method to access the actual data. This involves such tactics as using an index to process a given restriction or recognizing that a join could be done more efficiently by sorting both sides prior to performing the join.

Once all these phases of the compilation process have occurred, the plan is ready for actual execution within the query processor. The type of the result, if any, is known, and the request is known to be a semantically valid program of D4 instructions. Of course, this does not mean that run-time errors cannot occur, only that the system understands the request and is ready to attempt to perform it.

The various inference mechanisms of the Dataphor Server are all implemented in the compiler. Type inference is the most basic form of inference, and involves determining the result type of an expression. In addition, if the expression is table-valued, the compiler must infer structural information about the result such as keys, orders, constraints, defaults, references, metadata, and so on. The compiler also determines the various characteristics of the statement or expression, which determines whether or not it is valid in a given context. For a more complete discussion of the inference mechanisms of the D4 language, see the D4 Language Guide in this manual.

3.4. Query Processor

The query processor is responsible for actually performing the operations requested by users. A compiled plan in the Dataphor Server consists of a hierarchical representation of the action to be performed. Each operation is a node in the tree, and the children of any given node are the operands to the operation. For a typical query, this means that the leaves of the tree end in retrieval from devices, and the root of the tree is the result. For table operations, each node in this tree is actually a cursor which performs the requested operation. In this way, results are only materialized as they are requested. This approach to query processing is called pipelining and means that if the results of a query are never requested, i.e., the cursor is never stepped through, the results may never be materialized (of course, they will be materialized if required, for example if an operation requires sorted input and no index exists to satisfy the required order, but the Dataphor Server will only materialize intermediate results when necessary).

Query updatability is also implemented using this approach. When a data modification request is made on the cursor, it is propagated through each node of the plan.

3.5. Storage Integrator

The Storage Integrator (SI) utilizes an architecture called Storage Integration Architecture (SIA) and is concerned with providing an abstraction layer through which all data can be retrieved and manipulated. Data from this layer is presented to the Dataphor Server in the form of cursors, so the SI can take over the execution of a node in the tree of a query plan at any point. This replacement forms the basis of the query distribution capabilities of the Dataphor Server, resulting in seamless access and manipulation capabilities to disparate sources.

Because the SIA is abstracting other DBMSs, the division of tasks in the architecture closely mirrors that of a typical DBMS. Like the Dataphor Server itself, the functionality is layered into a hierarchy as follows:

The central abstraction mechanism of the SIA is the device. A device manages the instance level configuration and settings of a storage system with which the Dataphor Server can communicate. A device is also responsible for providing translation services between instructions of D4 and the appropriate instructions for the target system.

Each process in the Dataphor Server can communicate with any number of devices, and each device can support multiple requests from different processes. This relationship is managed by the process using a device session. Each process will have one device session for each device with which it must communicate. This device session coordinates transaction management between the Dataphor Server and the target system, and allows for requests coming in from the process to be prepared against the device.

Preparing a request from the Dataphor Server results in a device plan. Just as in the Dataphor Server, a device plan is ready for execution within the device. For SQL devices, this means that the requested instructions of D4 have been translated into an equivalent statement of SQL. If the device does not support the requested operation, the compiler binds that step of the query to the Dataphor Server, rather than to the device.

Once a request has been prepared, it can be executed against the device. If the request is a statement, the action is executed. Otherwise the operation opens a device cursor ranging over the result set produced by the device. This can either be returned directly to the CLI if the device was capable of performing the entire query, or it can be used as an argument to the next operation in the query processor. In either case, a cursor is used, so the pipelined approach is still maintained, at least by the Dataphor Server.

Manipulation is also propagated to devices where possible. Note that the chunking of a query for retrieval may be done at a different level than for update. For example, a device may be able to process a join, but not be able to update through it.

The translation process that occurs is specific to each device, however there are certain common facilities which can be provided to ease the task. For instance, every device must be capable of producing data in a format compatible with the types of the Dataphor Server. This gives rise to a mapping layer between the device and the data types in the catalog. For each scalar type that the device supports, a scalar type map is specified on the device. This scalar type map implements the translation of values of a given type to and from the device representation of the value and the host representation of the value within the Dataphor Server.

In addition, each device may be capable of performing many of the operators in the Dataphor Server. Again, this is facilitated by a mapping layer between the device and the operators in the catalog. For each operator which the device supports, an operator map is provided which handles the task of translating a given statement of D4 into the appropriate commands for the target system. Note that the existence of an operator map does not alone constitute support for a query containing the operator. The decision to support a particular query is based on several factors, of which supporting the operators and types referenced by the expression are only two.

Each device may also provide a mapping between users of D4 and users of the target system. This is accomplished using a device user. Device users can be created and manipulated using system provided operators in the Dataphor Server, or the visual security management interfaces exposed by Dataphoria. If no device user is specified, the Dataphor Server will use the credentials specified on the device itself. If no configuration is specified on the device, the Dataphor Server will use the credentials of the D4 user.

The result of this process is that both data access and data manipulation across devices is made completely transparent to users of the Dataphor Server. True logical data independence is achieved, as the results of any query, and hence any view, can be retrieved and updated without regard to the actual location of the data. A view can be defined which joins the data from a Microsoft SQL Server and an Oracle Server, and the view still behaves as if it were a single base table.

In addition, because the Dataphor Server itself is capable of processing the results of any expression of the relational algebra, any given query will always execute. This is true regardless of the level of relational support provided by the devices involved.

For more information on creating and manipulating devices, refer to the Catalog Elements chapter of the D4 Language Guide in this manual.

3.6. Automated Application Development Services

In addition to the services and capabilities of a traditional database management system, the Dataphor Server exposes various services aimed at enabling automated application development. These include:

3.6.1. Query and View Updatability

The Dataphor Server allows for updates against arbitrarily complex expressions (queries and views). The golden rule for updatability within the Dataphor Server is as follows:

"No update operation must ever be allowed to leave any [table] in a state that violates its own predicate." [3]

This updatability is possible because of the type inference mechanism. The result of this updatability is that the data consumer does not need to know the details of a given view. To a consumer, the Dataphor Server appears as a set of table variables, which all behave the same way whether they are declared as tables or views. This achieves a high degree of logical data independence, and allows the developer of the application schema to rearrange the logical model internally, without affecting the consumer’s external view of that model.

3.6.2. Advanced Business Rule Enforcement

Integrity constraints constitute the "business rules" of an application, and are an essential part of the application schema. The Dataphor Server provides the ability to easily declare such constraints at different levels of the schema. Constraints can be declared that enforce rules for the entire database, down to rules that affect only a single column or data type. Declarative database-wide integrity constraints allow advanced rules to be easily expressed that would ordinarily require multiple "triggers" to be written, if they could be enforced at all.

3.6.3. Metadata Services

The schema of a Dataphor application can be adorned with additional application-specific information called metadata. These additional attributes are then made available with the structure of the result set of any query and can be used by the application for whatever purpose desired.

The Frontend Services utilize this metadata, along with other structural information exposed by the application schema to enable the process of user interface derivation. The metadata can be used to provide hints to the derivation process such as what the title of a given column should be, or whether or not to include a reference as an embedded detail on a particular user interface.

Metadata is also inferred by the compiler through expressions of the D4 language. The type inference mechanisms of the D4 compiler have been extended to include metadata inference, as well as other structural information such as defaults, constraints, orders and so on.

3.6.4. Application Transactions

In addition to typical pessimistic transaction support, the Dataphor Server features Application Transactions, which are a type of optimistically concurrent transaction where concurrency control is not required, and consistency is checked at the time of commit. Application transactions are managed at the session level and can be joined by multiple processes within the same Dataphor Server.

A common problem encountered when writing applications is dealing with data entry and modification in a database containing complex rules. For example, a master/detail relationship (one-to-many) between tables enforced by a referential integrity constraint is common in application schemas. In many cases, a master row may not be "complete" until the appropriate detail rows are in place. Because of the integrity constraint, the master row must be present in the database before the detail rows.

Typical transaction support allows the rows to be entered simultaneously (although it should be noted that not all SQL-based DBMS products support this), but because transaction concurrency is handled pessimistically (i.e. by locking resources), transactions must be kept as short as possible to minimize resource contention.

For this reason, most applications do not solve this user interface problem using transaction support. Rather, it is typically handled by the developer within the presentation layer. Even with the aid of development tools that help developers accomplish the tasks of caching, this caching is an unnecessary burden, and is not a general solution. Hard-coded caching only works for the manipulation patterns anticipated by the developer. Application Transactions handle these problems in a general way, without requiring additional effort by the developer.

An application transaction is a managed buffer that mirrors exactly the application schema, with the exception of the constraints that would cause problems in the user interfaces, namely any constraint that involves more than one table. All the structural information available in the application schema is visible as part of the application transaction. And because the management of application transactions is automatically handled by the data access layer of the Dataphor clients, the entire process is transparent.

One of the most difficult problems in any database application is the presentation of a natural and intuitive search. The Dataphor Server solves this problem by providing navigational access to data using its browse capability. Using browse instead of order as part of the cursor definition provides this navigational access.

Cursor operations such as backwards navigation and searching can be performed efficiently against relational and indexed-access data sources when using a browse based cursor. As the browse cursor is navigated and searched, the query processor opens cursors internally based on appropriately transformed expressions. For example, when the user searches for the name "Karl", the underlying expression is modified to return all rows greater than or equal to the search criteria. This type of access is enabled against expressions of arbitrary complexity, not just simple table expressions.

Because of the this navigational access, user interfaces can be built based on browse cursors that are easy and efficient to search and navigate. The developer is not concerned with fetching data subsets, and the end user can see what they perceive as the entire table. In reality, only the data actually being presented is retrieved from the Dataphor Server.

3.6.6. Proposable Interfaces

The Dataphor Server is capable of answering questions about modification operations that are about to be performed. During data entry processes, rows are built a column at a time as the user enters data. The Dataphor Server provides a set of proposable interfaces that allow the application to perform intermediate processing while this data entry is occurring. There are three types of proposable questions.

  • Default is designed to provide the initial state for a newly inserted row. When applications begin the process of data entry, this interface can be used to determine the default values for the columns of the table such as a new surrogate identifier for the row.

  • Validate is designed to provide a mechanism for immediate value validation on a column level. As values are entered, this interface can be used to determine whether they would violate any constraint of the column or data type.

  • Change is designed to provide a mechanism for displaying the predicted results of an operation. After a value has been entered, this interface can be used to request the affects of the change on the rest of the row, such as a calculated column.

4. Frontend Server

The Frontend Server is a set of services built as a library in D4 and housed within the Dataphor Server. These services are primarily concerned with the presentation layer of a Dataphor application. The Frontend Server provides document support, query elaboration capabilities, user interface derivation services, and application entry points.

4.1. Frontend Library Extensions

The Frontend Server extends the concept of a library in the Dataphor Server to include the notion of a document. A document is the logical manifestation of an operating system file. Each document resides within a specific library, and has a name, which must be unique within that library. Documents are of some specific document type, and that type governs how the various Frontend services will deal with the document.

The Frontend Server exposes an API for dealing with documents. Standard I/O functionality is available for loading and saving documents, as well as other, more specialized functionality.

4.2. Frontend Forms

One important type of document is a Dataphor Form Document. These documents contain the complete description of a presentation layer user interface. These documents can be built manually, or the Frontend Server can be used to derive them automatically. In either case, the Frontend Server provides the ability to customize these forms through the use of visual form inheritance.

This process allows forms to be based on existing forms, and then modified for a specific use. These modifications can include the rearrangement of controls on the form, the modification of properties of the various elements on the form, and even the addition of new elements to the form. These modifications are then saved in a Customized Dataphor Form Document, which saves only the difference between the original form and the customization. When a customization is based on a derived user interface, this allows the customization to be made without impacting the dynamic nature of the application.

4.3. User Interface Derivation

The Frontend Server also exposes an API for automatically producing Dataphor Form Documents based on the application schema. Various types of interfaces can be produced, for example, a Browse interface for a given table can be produced, which will provide a table-level user interface to the data in the table. Row-level user interfaces can also be produced.

The user interface derivation process by default also includes references to other tables and views in the database. These references are exposed appropriately on the derived user interface. For example, when browsing the employees table, the employee phones table could appear as an item on the Details menu of the resulting user interface.

In addition to the default behavior provided by the Frontend Server, the derivation can be controlled through the use of metadata in the application schema. For example, the Frontend.Embedded tag can be used to indicate that a given reference should be embedded into the user interface for a given table. This allows the user interfaces to be tailored to an application’s specific requirements, while still allowing those user interfaces to be derived.

5. Frontend Clients

The Dataphor platform utilizes a generic user interface description language to allow clients based on different platforms to consume the same application. In this way, Dataphor applications can be defined one time, and deployed on multiple platforms.

Both clients expose use the concept of an alias to manage connection information with a specific Dataphor Server instance. The alias specifies the server instance, manages authentication information, and contains session-specific settings required to connect to a Dataphor Server. Each client exposes a set of interfaces for visually managing these aliases.

Once a connection is established, the clients then provide an interface to select an application from the list of applications deployed on that Dataphor Server instance. This process can be bypassed, if desired.

Each client communicates with the Dataphor Server using the Data Access Layer, requests the user interfaces described by the application, and manages the interaction with the user. Because of the services and capabilities exposed by the Dataphor Server, these processes can be completely automated. The resulting clients provide a rich user interface experience that is defined entirely within the centralized application schema.

The Dataphor product ships with a Windows and Web Client, but the architecture is designed to be extensible, and other clients could be easily developed for environments like PDA’s and cell phones.

6. Dataphoria

Dataphoria is an Integrated Development Environment for building Dataphor Applications. It provides a visual interface to perform various administrative functions in the Dataphor Server, as well as a hierarchical representation of the catalog, visual forms designer, and integrated ad-hoc query support.

For more information on using Dataphoria, refer to the Dataphor User’s Guide.

7. Conclusions

Application development is an extremely complex and multi-faceted problem. Software developers today are faced with the challenge of building applications faster, better, and cheaper, all at the same time. While there is no "Silver Bullet", raising the level of abstraction at which applications are built will dramatically reduce the complexity of the problems, and allow developers to focus on the core issues of an application, rather than the tedious and mundane issues of day-to-day development.

The Dataphor product provides an extremely flexible platform for application development. The features of the product are exposed as layers of enabling technologies that can each be used to achieve higher and higher levels of automated application development. The product was built from the ground up with extensibility in mind, so that even if the platform does not immediately support a desired capability, that support could be provided by systems developers extending the platform. The result is a truly revolutionary next-generation development platform that will continue to evolve with the ever-increasing complexity of application development.

The remainder of this manual is devoted to explaining how to take advantage of the features exposed by the Dataphor product in order to realize the full potential of automated application development.

results matching ""

    No results matching ""